Matthew Rutler: A Risky Rebound for Christina Aguilera?

Christina Aguilera has rebounded quickly from her recent divorce.
The singer has been spotted out with Matthew Rutler, a production assistant and a guitarist in the Nate Mott Band. The two met on the set of Burlesque in February and quickly bonded - much to the chagrin of friends.
“Christina is completely taken with Matthew," a source tells Star. "But he’s a wild rocker type with a reputation as a ladies’ man."

An insider says Rutler is in "heaven" because he's dating a celebrity.

“He networks like crazy with all the big names she introduces him to. He’s a major operator. And everything is on her dime, because he’s broke. Matt used to live in a crummy apartment with roommates; now he’s at her Beverly Hills mansion every night."

While pals worry that this relationship is "too much, too soon" for Christina, she isn't letting any personal issues affect her work. Check out a series of recent performance by Aguilera in her THG video section.

See also:

>Clinton Yunker: Dating Amber Portwood!

>What the Heck is Willow Smith Wearing?!? 

>Meet Avan Jogia: Who is Miley Cyrus' Boyfriend?

Presenting: The First Photo from Breaking Dawn!

Director Bill Condon has given Twilight Saga fans a major gift for Thanksgiving: The first photo from Breaking Dawn!
The film opens in less than a year, on November 18, 2011. While Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart have been photographed making out with each other in Brazil over the last couple weeks, this is the first actual image from the movie.
So, what is it? What did Condon Tweet? Find out below!

While rather vague to non-Twihards, anyone familiar with the story of Breaking Dawn can easily guess what is posted here.

It's a shot of Bella in bed, clutching a fist full of feathers, as her and Edward will be taking a big step in their relationship during the final installment of the Saga. Look for Stewart to be getting naked a lot as a result.

See also:
>Taylor Swift Bangs Away at American Music Awards
>Classmates: Willow Palin is a Binge-Drinking, Curf...
>Jessica Simpson Pregnant? Nah, Just Sick

Which Celeb Has a Tattoo on Her Ring Finger?

Brian Killian/WireImage

You're probably so busy looking at this celebrity's huge-ass ring to realize that she has a tiny tattoo right underneath her bling.
This is the first time we've noticed the ink, which appears to be the Roman numeral IV.
As for what it could mean, her birthday is September 4 and her equally famous hubby celebrates his on December 4.
Think you know who's got a tiny tattoo? Find out after the jump!

Brian Killian/WireImage

It's Beyoncé!
The star showed off her inked ring finger while hosting the launch party of Lorraine Schwartz's 2BHappy jewelry in NYC, which Kim Kardashian and Blake Lively also attended.
And in true diva fashion, the hostess was three hours late to Lavo for her own party!
We love all of B.'s jewels, but the pointy manicure? Not so much.

Kanye West: Taylor Swift Should've Stuck Up for Me!

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images

Why would Taylor Swift ever stand up for Kanye West?!
Leave it to the ego-inflated rapper to insist, during an on-stage rant last night, that the country cutie should have had Kanye's back after his infamous 2009 VMA outburst:


"Taylor never came to my defense in any interview and [she] rode the wave, and rode it and rode it!" he said during a rambling onstage rant last night at New York's Bowery Ballroom.
Huh? Yeah, we don't get it either.
West also blasted the media for how he believes it "exploited" George W. Bush's recent comment about the rapper. The former president said that West accusing him of not caring about African-Americans during Hurricane Katrina was one of his lowest points while in office.
"Look at how they exploited him," he ranted. "They said that he said that was his lowest moment. And as a mass, as America, we took that as a fact.
"If you look at the interview, he said, 'It's one of his lowest moments,' and he said it about 10 different things," West griped.
"But because the popularity of me, they exploited that to make you watch the interview and make you feel that he was stupider than ever...It shows you the way they try to villainize."

Paris Hilton’s Hair-Raising Battle Continues

AP Photo/Mark Damon

This is how rich people say, "I know you are, but what am I?"
Paris Hilton is countersuing the hair extension company that is suing her for $35 million, demanding $3 million for fraud, breach-of-contract and inappropriately trading on that famous Hilton name.
Does the heiress' case have roots, or is it all a tease?


Hairtech International sued Paris in August, claiming she wore a competitor's hair extensions and breached her contact by skipping promotional appearances, albeit because she was in jail.
Paris' complaint says Hairtech's story is "born of pure fiction" and alleges that the company exploited her celebrity status. Her filing includes a letter from a colleague of plaintiff Chris Volek's, in which the colleague states that Volek and others at Hairtech have "left a trail of complaints and defrauded victims in their wake."
In various emails, Volek called Hilton "truly amazing," "sensational" and "freaking Stunning [sic]," according to Paris' filing.
Hairtech "sought to capitalize on Ms. Hilton's brand and fame by offering to pay substantial 'guaranteed' royalties in exchange for the right to associate Ms. Hilton's brand with their line of hair products," the suit alleges.
The heiress claims Hairtech failed to pay "in excess of $1.7 million," going so far as to commit "fraud by secretly altering documents presented to Ms. Hilton's company for signature."
All in all, Ms. Hilton is asking for $2.1 million in damages, at least $400,000 in punitive damages and attorney fees, and $500,000 in declaratory relief.